Equitable Property Division Strategies
While many clients are focused on what percentage of the marital estate they receive, the overall percentage can be less important than the type of asset received. The parties can often overlook elements of liquidity, costs of sale or transfer and tax effects. These factors are 10.1 and 10.2 of the statutory list of factors to be considered by the court when dividing the estate of the parties. When considering their alternatives, parties can and frequently will consider all assets as belonging to the same "class" or category.
Consider two examples:
- A divorcing couple owns a home worth $250,000.00 today with a mortgage balance of $100,000.00. If you represent the spouse who wants to keep the home, what are the considerations? If you represent the spouse who doesn't want the home?
- The parties have a marital residence with $100,000.00 of equity and one spouse has a 401(k) with a marital value of $100,000.00. Are these assets equal?
Divorcing spouses also have to consider intangible factors surrounding their marital estate: the marital home, their retirement benefits, and the source of the asset (family gift or sentimental value). With regard to enforcement of a marital settlement agreement, consider
Annechino v. Joire, 946 A.2d 121, 2008 Pa. Super. 50 (2008). The common law rule precluding enforcement in divorce of unmerged property settlement agreements has been superseded by statute (23 Pa. C.S. ยง3105(a)) which provides that an agreement regarding matters within the jurisdiction of the court in divorce is within that court's jurisdiction regardless of whether it was incorporated into the decree. Additionally, it is irrelevant that equitable distribution was not plead within the divorce complaint as the property settlement agreement is a matter within the jurisdiction of the family court. |