Harrisburg Divorce Lawyer - York Family Law Attorney
Harrisburg Family Law Attorney - York Divorce Lawyer Family Law Firm Profile Divorce Attorney Profiles Frequently Asked Family Law Questions Client Testimonials Contact an Attorney at Our Firm
Divorce & Family Law Practice Areas
You are in:
Divorce
Introduction
Divorce
Child Custody/Visitation
Alimony/Support
Equitable Distribution
Dividing Assets & Liabilities
Marital/Non-Marital Assets
Division of Retirement Benefits
Property Division Strategies
Insurance & Inheritance
Dividing Debt
Mediation
Collaborative Practice
High Net Worth Divorce
High Net Worth Divorce
High Net Worth Divorce
Click Here to View our Blog
Instantly Connect with a Divorce Lawyer

Equitable Property Division Strategies

While many clients are focused on what percentage of the marital estate they receive, the overall percentage can be less important than the type of asset received.  The parties can often overlook elements of liquidity, costs of sale or transfer and tax effects.  These factors are 10.1 and 10.2 of the statutory list of factors to be considered by the court when dividing the estate of the parties.  When considering their alternatives, parties can and frequently will consider all assets as belonging to the same "class" or category. 

Consider two examples:

  1. A divorcing couple owns a home worth $250,000.00 today with a mortgage balance of $100,000.00.  If you represent the spouse who wants to keep the home, what are the considerations?  If you represent the spouse who doesn't want the home?

  2. The parties have a marital residence with $100,000.00 of equity and one spouse has a 401(k) with a marital value of $100,000.00.  Are these assets equal?

Divorcing spouses also have to consider intangible factors surrounding their marital estate: the marital home, their retirement benefits, and the source of the asset (family gift or sentimental value).

With regard to enforcement of a marital settlement agreement, consider Annechino v. Joire, 946 A.2d 121, 2008 Pa. Super. 50 (2008).  The common law rule precluding enforcement in divorce of unmerged property settlement agreements has been superseded by statute (23 Pa. C.S. ยง3105(a)) which provides that an agreement regarding matters within the jurisdiction of the court in divorce is within that court's jurisdiction regardless of whether it was incorporated into the decree.  Additionally, it is irrelevant that equitable distribution was not plead within the divorce complaint as the property settlement agreement is a matter within the jurisdiction of the family court.
Colgan Marzzacco Information Center Instant Callback from an Attorney
Main Site Divorce Lawyer
Car Accident Attorney Criminal Defense Attorney, DUI Lawyer
Attorney Web Design The information on this South Central Pennsylvania Family Lawyer / Divorce Attorney website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Principal Office: 130 West Church Street, Suite 100 Dillsburg, York County, PA 17019
Harrisburg Office: 2411 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110
York Office: 1 East Market Street, Suite 201, York, PA 17401